This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
public:nnels:cataloguing:start:subjectheadings [2018/11/25 01:04] robert.macgregor |
public:nnels:cataloguing:start:subjectheadings [2024/05/09 05:04] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
* we could also map LOC to BISAC. Is there a crosswalk that already exists? | * we could also map LOC to BISAC. Is there a crosswalk that already exists? | ||
- | ===================================== | + | ............................. |
- | If we go with a simplified version of LOC we could copy catalogue from libraries easily enough. How would we determine what the subset is? Do we just cap the depth of the subject heading at like 3 layers or something and lop off anything beyond that? | + | |
- | I think regardless, it might be worthwhile putting one BISAC heading in. BISAC seems to use pretty natural language, and I assume the keyword searches might have an easy time hitting on one of the parts of a BISAC heading. | + | If we go with a simplified version of LOC we could copy catalogue from libraries easily enough. |
+ | |||
+ | I think regardless, it might be worthwhile putting one BISAC heading in. BISAC seems to use pretty natural language, and I assume the keyword searches might have an easy time hitting on one of the parts of a BISAC heading. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am not as familiar with the collection as I would have liked to be. From the record sets I have been working on, BISAC would be a good fit. - LL |